āĻā§āĻāύā§āϤāĻŋāϤ⧠âāϏāĻĢā§âāĻ āĻĒāĻžāĻā§āĻžāϰâ āĻāĻĨāĻžāĻāĻž āĻā§āĻŦ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāϞāĻŋāϤāĨ¤ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āĻĻā§āĻļ āĻ āύā§āϝāĻžāύā§āϝ āĻĻā§āĻļā§āϰ āĻāĻĒāϰ āύāĻŋāĻā§āϰ āϏāĻžāĻāϏā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋāĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāĻžāĻŦ āĻŦāĻŋāϏā§āϤāĻžāϰ āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰāϞ⧠āϝ⧠āĻā§āĻāύā§āϤāĻŋāĻ āĻļāĻā§āϤāĻŋ āĻ āϰā§āĻāύ āĻāϰā§, āϏā§āĻāĻžāĻ āϏāĻĢā§âāĻ āĻĒāĻžāĻā§āĻžāϰāĨ¤ āĻ āύā§āĻā§āϰ āĻŽāϤā§āĻ, āĻāĻžāϰāϤā§āϰ āĻāĻ āĻā§āώāĻŽāϤāĻž āĻ āϰā§āĻāύā§āϰ āĻā§āώā§āĻāĻž āĻāϰāĻž āĻāĻāĻŋāϤāĨ¤ āĻā§ āĻāĻžāĻŦā§? āĻŽāύ⧠āϰāĻžāĻāĻž āĻĻāϰāĻāĻžāϰ, āϏāĻā§āϝāϤāĻžāϰ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻšāĻžāϏ⧠āĻāĻžāϰāϤā§āϰ āϏāĻŦāĻā§ā§ā§ āĻļāĻā§āϤāĻŋāĻŽāĻžāύ āϏāĻžāĻāϏā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋāĻ āϰāĻĢāϤāĻžāύāĻŋāĻāĻŋ āĻšāϞ āĻŦā§āĻĻā§āϧ āĻĻāϰā§āĻļāύ, āϝ⧠āĻĻāϰā§āĻļāύ āĻļāĻžāύā§āϤāĻŋ āĻ āĻ āĻšāĻŋāĻāϏāĻžāϰ āĻāĻĻāϰā§āĻļāĻā§ āϤā§āϞ⧠āϧāϰā§āĨ¤
āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāĻŖā§āϰ āĻļāĻŋāĻŦ āĻĒā§āϰāϧāĻžāύāϤ āĻĒā§āϰā§āώā§āϰ āĻāϰāĻžāϧā§āϝāĨ¤ āĻāĻĒā§āϏ āĻāϰ⧠āĻļāĻŋāĻŦā§āϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻĨāĻžā§ āĻāϞ āĻĸā§āϞ⧠āĻļāĻŋāĻŦāϰāĻžāϤā§āϰāĻŋ āĻĒāĻžāϞāύā§āϰ āϝ⧠āĻŦā§āϰāϤ āĻŽā§ā§ā§āĻĻā§āϰ āĻļā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻšā§ā§āĻā§, āϏā§āĻāĻŋ āĻĒāĻŋāϤā§āϤāύā§āϤā§āϰā§āϰ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻšāĻžāϏāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻžāϰāϏāĻžāĻāĻŋāĨ¤
āĻāĻžāϰāϤ⧠âāĻŦā§āĻāĻŋāϤā§āϰā§āϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻā§ āĻāĻā§āϝâ āύāĻŋā§ā§ āĻāĻŽāϰāĻž āĻ āύā§āĻ āĻāĻĨāĻž āĻŦāϞ⧠āĻĨāĻžāĻāĻŋ, āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻāĻĨāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āϏāϤā§āϝ āĻ āϰā§āĻĨ āĻāĻĒāϞāĻŦā§āϧāĻŋ āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻāĻžāĻāϞ⧠āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāĻŋāĻā§ āύāĻŋāϰā§āĻĻāĻŋāώā§āĻ āϏāĻžāĻāϏā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋāĻ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻšā§āϝā§āϰ āĻĻāĻŋāĻā§ āĻĻā§āώā§āĻāĻŋāĻĒāĻžāϤ āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻšāĻŦā§āĨ¤ āϝā§āĻŽāύ, āĻāĻŽāύ āύāĻžāύāĻž āĻāϤā§âāϏāĻŦ āĻāĻā§, āϝā§āĻā§āϞāĻŋāϰ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻšāĻžāϏāĻŋāĻ āĻāϤā§âāϏ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻŋāύā§āύ āĻ āĻā§āĻāϞ⧠āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻŋāύā§āύ āϰāĻāĻŽ, āĻ āĻĨāĻ āĻ āύā§āĻ āĻāĻžā§āĻāĻžāϤā§āĻ āϝā§āĻā§āϞāĻŋ āĻŦāĻāϰā§āϰ āĻā§āύāĻ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āϏāĻŽā§ā§āĻ āĻāĻĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻŋāϤ āĻšā§ā§ āĻāϏāĻā§āĨ¤
āĻŦāĻāϰ āĻā§ā§āĻ āĻāĻā§ āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āϝāĻāύ āĻāĻžāϰāϤ āϏāϰāĻāĻžāϰā§āϰ āϏāĻāϏā§āĻā§āϤāĻŋ āϏāĻāĻŋāĻŦ āĻāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āϤāĻāύ āĻĒāĻļā§āĻāĻŋāĻŽāĻŦāĻā§āĻ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻžāϰā§āϰ āϤāĻŋāύ āĻāύ āĻ āĻĢāĻŋāϏāĻžāϰ āĻā§āύā§āĻĻā§āϰā§ā§ āϏāĻžāϰā§āĻā§āϞā§āϰ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻŋāύā§āύ āĻŽāύā§āϤā§āϰāĻā§ āϏāĻāĻŋāĻŦ āĻĒāĻĻā§ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻžāϞāĻŋ, āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻ āύā§āϝ āϰāĻžāĻā§āϝā§āϰ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻžāϰā§āϰ āĻ āĻĢāĻŋāϏāĻžāϰ, āĻāĻŽāύ āĻā§ā§āĻāĻāύ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āĻ āϰā§āĻĨ āĻŽāύā§āϤā§āϰāĻā§, āϝā§āĻāύāĻž āĻāĻŽāĻŋāĻļāύā§āĨ¤ āĻāϤā§āϤāϰāĻĒā§āϰāĻĻā§āĻļ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻžāϰā§āϰ āĻĒā§āϞāĻ āĻāĻā§āĻā§āĻĒāĻžāϧā§āϝāĻžā§ āĻĒā§āϰāϧāĻžāύāĻŽāύā§āϤā§āϰā§āϰ āϏāĻāĻŋāĻŦ āĻšā§ā§āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύāĨ¤ āĻĢāĻŋāĻāĻŋāϤ⧠āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āĻĒāĻļā§āĻāĻŋāĻŽāĻŦāĻā§āĻā§āϰ āĻŦāϰā§āϤāĻŽāĻžāύ āĻ āϰā§āĻĨāĻŽāύā§āϤā§āϰ⧠āĻ āĻŽāĻŋāϤ āĻŽāĻŋāϤā§āϰāĨ¤ āϏāĻŋ. āĻāĻ. āĻāĻ.-āĻāϰ āĻĒā§āϰāϧāĻžāύ āϏāĻāĻŋāĻŦ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āϤāϰā§āĻŖ āĻĻāĻžāϏāĨ¤ āĻĻā§āĻāύ āύāύ- āĻāĻ.āĻ.āĻāϏ. āϏāĻāĻŋāĻŦ āĻāĻŋāϞā§āύ āĻŦāĻŋāĻā§āĻāĻžāύāĻŦāĻŋāώā§āĻ āĻŽāύā§āϤā§āϰāĻā§ â āĻāĻāĻāύ āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻŽāĻžāύāĻŦāĻŋāĻ āĻļāĻā§āϤāĻŋ āĻĻāĻĢāϤāϰā§āϰ āĻā§āĻŦāĻ āĻā§āϰā§āϤā§āĻŦāĻĒā§āϰā§āĻŖ āĻĻāĻžā§āĻŋāϤā§āĻŦā§, āĻāϰ āĻ āύā§āϝ āĻāύ āϏāĻŋ.āĻāϏ.āĻāĻ.āĻāϰ-āĻāĨ¤
The first mention that one gets is about the celebration of shining lights is when Ramachandra returned victorious to Ayodhya, though Lakshmi does not feature here. The Kamasutra of Vatsyana, whose final product also appears like the Ramayana in the 3rd or 4th century AD mentions Yaksha's night, when houses should be illuminated with numerous tiny earthen lamps. âYakshaâ were usually short pot-bellied indigenous creatures who stood outside temples as dwaar-paals. The Jain acharyas, Hemchandra and Yashodhara, describe this âYaksha night of lightsâ and this point to the Brahmanic adoption of a popular local observance.
āĻāĻ āĻā§āϏāĻŦā§āϰ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻāϞā§āϞā§āĻ āĻĒāĻžāĻ āϰāĻžāĻŽāĻžā§āĻŖā§, āϰāĻžāĻŽāĻāύā§āĻĻā§āϰ āϝāĻāύ āϝā§āĻĻā§āϧāĻā§ āĻāϰ⧠āϏā§āϤāĻžāĻā§ āύāĻŋā§ā§ āĻĢāĻŋāϰāϞā§āύ, āϤāĻāύ āĻ āϝā§āϧā§āϝāĻžāϰ āĻāϰ⧠āĻāϰ⧠āĻĻā§āĻĒāĻžāϞāĻŋāĻāĻžā§ āĻāϞ⧠āĻā§āĻŦāϞā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤ āϏā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻ āĻŦāĻļā§āϝ āϞāĻā§āώā§āĻŽā§āϰ āĻā§āύāĻ āύāĻžāĻŽāĻāύā§āϧ āύā§āĻāĨ¤ āϤā§āϤā§ā§ āĻŦāĻž āĻāϤā§āϰā§āĻĨ āĻļāϤāĻžāĻŦā§āĻĻā§āϤ⧠āϰāĻžāĻŽāĻžā§āĻŖā§āϰ āĻŽā§āĻāĻžāĻŽā§āĻāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāϏāĻžāĻŽā§āĻŋāĻ āĻŦāĻžāϤā§âāϏā§āϝāĻžā§āύā§āϰ āĻāĻžāĻŽāϏā§āϤā§āϰ⧠āϝāĻā§āώā§āϰ āϰāĻžāϤā§āϰāĻŋāϰ āĻāĻĨāĻž āĻāĻā§, āϝ⧠āϰāĻžāϤ⧠āĻā§āĻ āĻā§āĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĻā§āĻĒ āĻā§āĻŦāĻžāϞāĻŋā§ā§ āĻāύāĻĒāĻĻ āϏāĻžāĻāĻžāϤ⧠āĻšā§āĨ¤ āĻāĻāĻŋ āĻāĻ āϞā§āĻāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ, āϝāĻž āĻŦā§āϰāĻžāĻšā§āĻŽāĻŖā§āϝāϤāύā§āϤā§āϰ āĻā§āϰāĻŽāĻļ āĻā§āϰāĻšāĻŖ āĻāϰ⧠āύāĻŋā§ā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻāĻāĻžāύā§āĻ āϞāĻā§āώā§āĻŽā§āϰ āĻā§āύāĻ āĻĒā§āϰāϤā§āϝāĻā§āώ āĻāϞā§āϞā§āĻ āύā§āĻāĨ¤ āĻ āĻŦāĻļā§āϝ āϝāĻā§āώ āĻĨā§āĻā§ āϝā§āĻŽāύ āĻāĻļā§āĻŦāϰā§āϝā§āϰ āĻĻā§āĻŦāϤāĻž āĻā§āĻŦā§āϰ āĻāϞā§āύ, āϞāĻā§āώā§āĻŽā§ āϝāĻĻāĻŋ āϤā§āĻŽāύāĻ āĻāϏ⧠āĻĨāĻžāĻā§āύ, āϤāĻž āĻšāϞ⧠āĻāϞāĻžāĻĻāĻž āĻāĻĨāĻžāĨ¤ āϤāĻŦā§ āĻāĻāĻž āĻ āĻŋāĻāĻ āϝā§, āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāĻŖā§āϰ āĻĻā§āĻŦā§ āϞāĻā§āώā§āĻŽā§ āĻāĻ āϏāĻŽā§ āϝāĻā§āώāĻĻā§āϰ āĻĻā§āĻĒāĻžāϞā§āĻāĻŋāϤ āϰāĻžāϤā§āϰāĻŋāϰ āĻā§āϏāĻŦāĻāĻŋ āύāĻŋāĻā§āϰ āĻāϰ⧠āύā§āύāĨ¤
B V Keskar was Pandit Nehruâs Information Minister for a decade, from 1952 to 1962. For him, Hindi film songs were a strict âno-noâ where Akashvani was concerned, as in his opinion, it should be the mission of the public broadcaster, to encourage only classical music. He had to face a lot of pressure and ridicule for this rather obdurate stand, but there is no doubt that had it not been for him, Indian classical music may have never reached and enthralled the common man,because classical music by its very nature was meant primarily for the elite.
The year was 1967. I had joined Class X, in the Humanities Section, with an enviable track record of standing last or second last in every class from VI onward. The crowning glory was my failure to pass Class VIII, followed by my close shaves in my second year in the same class as well as in the next class, when I studied Science in the âHigher Secondaryâ stream, where one had to fight all the time. The other âfeathersâ in my cap were the several warnings received for âpoor conductâ, mischief and misbehavior. In other words, I was declared an ideal bad student when I joined, not without trepidation, the first day in my new class.
Every major nation in the world has a public broadcaster and there must be some reason why they do. Before we can discuss the shortcomings of Prasar Bharati, the autonomous body that supervises Doordarshan (DD) and All India Radio (AIR), we may recall that even as its Act was passed by Parliament in 1990, its spirit of autonomy was vitiated by two sections, 32 and 33, which took away with the left hand what the right gave. They ensured that all its major decisions like manpower, recruitment, service conditions, salaries and critical issues would be decided only by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (I&B).
On the 16 th June 1912, Rabindranath Tagore reached London aftersailing for three weeks. He had utilized the journey to complete the last lotof his translations and was relieved that he had finally made it. His disappointment for not being permitted to travel in March of that year, on health grounds was thus overcome.
āĻāĻ āĻĻā§āϰāĻĻāϰā§āĻļāύ⧠āϰāĻžāϤ āϏāĻžā§ā§ āĻĻāĻļāĻāĻžā§ âāĻā§āĻŦāύāϏā§āĻŽā§āϤāĻŋ: āϏāĻŋāϞā§āĻā§āĻā§āĻĄ āĻŽā§āĻŽāϰāĻŋāĻā§â āĻĻā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻšāĻŦā§āĨ¤ āϰāĻŦā§āύā§āĻĻā§āϰāύāĻžāĻĨ āĻ āĻžāĻā§āϰ āĻŦāĻŋāώā§ā§ āĻāϤā§āĻĒāϰā§āĻŖ āĻā§āώā§āϰ āϤāĻĨā§āϝāĻāĻŋāϤā§āϰāĨ¤ āϏāϰā§āĻŦāĻāĻžāϰāϤā§ā§ āĻĻāϰā§āĻļāĻāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāύā§āϝ āϤā§āϰāĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻŋ, āϤāĻžāĻ āĻāĻāϰāĻžāĻāĻŋāϤ⧠â āϏāϤā§āϝāĻāĻŋā§ āϰāĻžā§ā§āϰ āϤāĻĨā§āϝāĻāĻŋāϤā§āϰāĻāĻŋāϰ āĻŽāϤā§āĻāĨ¤ āĻāĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻž āϝ⧠āĻ āĻŦāĻļā§āώ⧠āĻĻā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻšāĻŦā§, āĻāĻāĻž āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦāϞ āϏā§āĻŦāϏā§āϤāĻŋāϰ āĻāĻŦāϰ â āĻā§ āĻ āϏāĻŽā§āĻāĻŦ āĻĻā§āϰāĻŋ āĻšāϞ āϝāĻĻāĻŋāĻāĨ¤ āĻāϤā§āϰ āϏāĻā§āĻā§ āϝāϤ āĻŦāĻžāϰāĻ āĻāĻĨāĻž āĻšā§ā§āĻā§, āĻŽāύ⧠āĻšāϤ āĻāĻ āϏāϰāĻāĻžāϰāĻŋ āĻĻā§āϰā§āĻāϏā§āϤā§āϰāϤāĻžā§ āĻŦāĻĄā§āĻĄ āĻšāϤāĻžāĻļ āĻšā§ā§ āĻĒā§ā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āϏāϰāĻāĻžāϰāĻŋ āĻāĻžāĻā§ āĻāϤāĻāĻž āĻĻā§āϰāĻŋ āĻā§āύ āĻšā§, āĻ āϏā§āĻāĻž āĻŦā§āĻāϤā§āĻ āĻĒāĻžāϰāϤ āύāĻžāĨ¤ āĻāĻ āĻāϤ⧠āĻĨāĻžāĻāϞ⧠āĻā§āĻļāĻŋ āĻšāϤāĨ¤ āĻāϰ āĻāύā§āϝ āĻ āύā§āϤāϤ āĻāĻāĻā§āĻā§ āĻāϰāĻž āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāϰā§āϤāĻŦā§āϝāĻ āĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤
Prasar Bharati came into being on 28 th November 1997 after Prasar Bharati Act of 1990 was finally implemented by the Government and the Directorates of All India Radio (Akashvani) and Doordarshan were separated from Ministry of Information & Broadcasting and placed under an âautonomous bodyâ. It was a momentous decision that came some seven years after Parliament had taken pains to conceive of a Public Service Broadcaster, whose character was eloquently worded in the Statement of Objects and Reasons.
āĻāϞāĻāĻžāϤāĻžāϰ āĻā§āϰāĻžāĻŽ, āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āώ āĻāϰ⧠āĻŽā§āĻĻāĻžāύ āĻ āϏāĻāϞāĻā§āύ āĻāϞāĻžāĻāĻžā§, āĻāĻāĻāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āώ āĻāĻāϰā§āώāĻŖ āĻšā§ā§ āĻāĻ āϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰā§āĨ¤ āϏāĻšāĻā§āĻ āĻāĻŽāϰāĻž āĻā§ā§āĻāĻāĻŋ āϰāĻāĻāĻā§ āĻā§āϰāĻžāĻŽ āĻļā§āϧā§āĻŽāĻžāϤā§āϰ āϏā§āĻĨāĻžāύā§ā§ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻļā§ āĻĒāϰā§āϝāĻāĻāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāύā§āϝ āϰā§āĻā§ āĻĻāĻŋāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻŋāĨ¤ āĻāĻŋā§āĻĒā§āϰ āϰā§āĻĄā§āϰ āĻāĻĨāĻžāĻ āϧāϰāĻž āϝāĻžāĻāĨ¤ āϰāĻžāϏā§āϤāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āĻāύāĻžāĻā§ - āĻāĻžāύāĻžāĻā§ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻšāĻžāϏā§āϰ āĻāύā§āϧāĨ¤ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻāĻžā§āĻŋāĻā§ā§āĻžāϰ āĻāĻŋā§ āĻ ā§āϞ⧠āϝāĻžāĻā§āĻžāĻāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāϰāĻžāĻ āϏāĻŽāϏā§āϝāĻžāĨ¤ āϧā§āϰāĻāϤāĻŋāϰ āĻā§āϰāĻžāĻŽā§ āĻŦāϏ⧠āĻāĻŋā§āĻĒā§āϰ āϰā§āĻĄ āϧāϰ⧠āϝāĻžāĻā§āĻžāĻāĻž āύāĻŋāĻāϏāύā§āĻĻā§āĻšā§ āĻāĻāĻāĻž āĻĻāĻžāϰā§āĻŖ āĻ āĻāĻŋāĻā§āĻāϤāĻž āĻšāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰā§āĨ¤
āϏā§āύā§āϞ āĻāĻā§āĻā§āĻĒāĻžāϧā§āϝāĻžā§āĻā§ āĻāĻŦā§ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻĻā§āĻā§āĻāĻŋ āĻ āĻŋāĻ āĻŽāύ⧠āĻĒā§ā§ āύāĻžāĨ¤ āĻŽāύ⧠āĻāĻā§, āϤāĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒāĻĻ āϰāĻžā§ā§āϰ āĻāĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻāĻ āĻāĻĄā§āĻĄāĻžā§ āĻāĻāĻĻāĻŋāύ āϤāĻžāĻāĻā§ āĻĻā§āĻāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āĻŦā§āϏ⧠āϤāϰā§āĻŖ, āĻāĻžāϞ⧠āĻŽā§āĻāĻž āĻĢā§āϰā§āĻŽā§āϰ āĻāĻļāĻŽāĻžāϰ āύā§āĻā§ āĻāĻ āĻā§ā§āĻž āϏāύā§āϧāĻžāύ⧠āĻā§āĻāĨ¤ āϤāĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒāĻĻāĻŦāĻžāĻŦā§ āϝā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻā§āĻŦ āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāĻŖāĻŦāύā§āϤ, āϏāϰāϏ āĻāϰ āϤāĻžāĻāϰ āĻĒāĻžāĻā§āĻāϞāĻžāĻāύāĻā§āϞ⧠āĻĻāĻŋā§ā§ āĻāĻŖā§āĻāĻžāϰ āĻĒāϰ āĻāĻŖā§āĻāĻž āĻŽāĻžāϤāĻŋā§ā§ āϰāĻžāĻāϤā§āύ, āϏā§āύā§āϞāĻĻāĻž āϏā§āĻāĻžāύ⧠āĻ āύā§āĻā§āĻ, āĻāĻžāĻāĻā§ āĻāĻŽāĻĒā§āϰā§āϏ āĻāϰāĻžāϰ āĻā§āύāĻ āĻĻāĻžā§ āύā§āĻ āϤāĻžāĻāϰāĨ¤ āĻšā§āϤ⧠āĻā§āϞāĻžāϏ āĻšāĻžāϤ⧠āĻāϰāĻžāĻŽā§ āĻŦāϏ⧠āĻāĻā§āύ āĻāĻ āĻā§āĻŖā§, āĻā§āύāĻ āĻā§āĻŖāĻŽā§āĻā§āϧ āϤāϰā§āĻŖā§āĻā§ āĻŽāĻŋāώā§āĻāĻŋ āĻāϰ⧠āĻŦāϞāĻā§āύ, āϤāĻžāϰ āĻā§āĻ āĻĻā§āĻā§ āĻāĻžāϰ⧠āϏā§āύā§āĻĻāϰāĨ¤ āϤāĻžāĻāϰ āĻāĻ āϏā§āĻŦāĻā§āύ, āϏā§āĻŦāϤāĻāϏā§āĻĢā§āϰā§āϤ āĻāĻĨā§āĻĒāĻāĻĨāύā§āϰ āĻĸāĻāĻ āϤāĻžāĻāϰ āϞā§āĻāĻžā§ āĻāύā§āĻāĻŋāϞ āĻāĻ āĻ āύāĻžā§āĻžāϏ, āĻŦāĻŋāϰāϞ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻŽā§āϤāĻžāĨ¤
Swami Vivekananda was one of the greatest patriots, thinkers, philosophers and spiritual leaders, India has ever produced. He lived only for thirty nine and a half years, of which he devoted the last nine and half years totally to the service of humanity. Though he left the world well over a century ago, Swamijiâs teachings remains very relevant to us in the twenty-first 21st Century. This is more so because mankind is struggling more now to adjust to more frequent socioeconomic changes. The very rapid pace at which developments are overtaking us is surely leading to a transitory segment of social confusion, unrest, and apprehension. This produces a very demanding and stressful life style.
Solitary, Poor, Nasty, Brutish and Short - (1971) â Presidency College & Naxalite Movement in 1971
âLife was solitary, poor, nasty,â droned the professor on a hot, lazy afternoon when the body clocks of most students signalled that it was time for a lovely surreptitious siesta, without actually dozing off on to the next guyâs shoulder. This was sometime in my first year at Presidency, when I was being introduced to the wondrous possibilities of how the State had emerged in history.
I had no idea that George W Bush had chosen to accompany me to Rome during the weekend â en-route to Albania from his G-8 conference in Germany. This gentleman seems to excite agitationists all over the world, and Italians are, even without much provocation, a rather excitable lot. Thus the city of St. Peter was now in the hands of protestors and the Italian government felt that the situation was so serious that the normal police would be unable to handle it. Hence, one was treated to a very rare spectacle of witnessing the smart, semi-military crack force, the carabinieri on real time prowl all over Rome â in their dark blue macho uniforms and their threatening rifles and pistols. Girls, both turisti and local drooled over those handsome hunks that were straining to impress them with their crackling walky- talkies.
I came across a photograph of Pandit Nehru sitting on a simple wooden bed, covered with a frugal white sheet and a few batik spreads, and a couple of pillows strewn behind and beside him. There were no crowds on the dais, which was obviously during the Convocation of Visva Bharati in (1954), and while the Upacharya, who was at the right corner of the photo, delivered his address over an ancient microphone, Panditji looked straight at the audience.
The dichotomous relation between the two extremities of any religion, however rigid be its structure or dogma â between the formal, scriptural version on the one hand and the plethora of practices and rituals that pass off as the âlittleâ or popular tradition on the other â have never ceased to enchant the observer and entice the researcher.
Of the millions who stand reverentially before the thousands of Durga images in Bengal during the annual pujas, how many wonder as to why Kartikeya â the valiant general of the gods â looks away so apathetically, when his mother is locked in a mortal conflict with one of the most dangerous adversaries of the gods? Why do the daughters, Lakshmi and Saraswati look so benign and disinterested, when Durgaâs eyes puff and widen in rage and fury? And their potbellied elephant-headed sibling, Ganesha: what is his role?
